Top Patent Drawing Problems Inventors Make and How to Avoid Them: Patent drawings are very important part of any patent application process as these provide a clear visual representation of an invention. The patent drawings help the inventors, patent examiners and the public to understand how the invention works. These drawings not only enhance the written detailed description of the application, but they also play a key role in shaping the examiner’s understanding and interpretation of the invention.

Using Colour drawings

Understanding the Problem: Most patent offices, including the USPTO, require black-and-white line drawings. Colours are not allowed, if the invention is related tocell diagrams, plants, or micro-organisms, which cannot be achieve via line diagrams, inventor can use the images in greyscale to show every feature of the invention. However, if a drawing can be shown with lines, then the PTO will object to the greyscale drawings.

How to Avoid It: Always follow the guidelines of the respective PTO and stick to black-and-white line drawings or use the greyscale images instead of colour images.

Missing or Inconsistent Reference Numbers

Understanding the Problem: Reference numbers play a vital role in understanding how the invention works. Use of Incorrect, duplicate, or inconsistent reference number in the other figures or in written description often lead to an office action as the examiner may not understand how the invention works.

How to Avoid It: Number each component/part consistently across all drawings and make sure every number is referenced in the written description.

Poor Line Quality

Understanding the Problem: Thin, pixelated lines reduces the clarity of the drawings, which often leads to another rejection:

How to Avoid It: Hire a professional patent illustrator as they have the access to various CAD software, which certainly minimize the risks of these rejections.

Text Height and margins

Understanding the Problem: One of the most common errors that often leads to office actions are the size or height of the font and sheet margins prescribed by the PTO.

How to Avoid It: The height of the text and reference numbers has to be at least 0.32cm and the drawings must be scaled properly to fit within the prescribed margins.

Incomplete Set of Views (in Design Patent Drawings)

Understanding the Problem: Design patents exclusively protects aesthetic appearance of the invention/product only but does not protect its functionality and at least contains seven (7) standard views. Missing views, which does not show each and every side of the invention is also one of the main reasons of the rejection.

How to Avoid It: Always include at least seven (7) standard views (i.e. Perspective View, Front View, Rear/Back View, Left Side View, Right Side View, Top View and a Bottom View) to show every aspect of the product.

Projection and Scaling of views

Understanding the Problem: Unlike utility patents, in design patents the drawings fully rely on the projections and scaling of the views and drawings should be consistent. The scaling of all the standard views should be same with respect to each other. DIY drawings often ignores the scaling/projection of the figures.

How to Avoid It: Each view of the design should be shown identically without any variations in them. Maximum scale should be used which can be fitted within the margin to show every claimed and disclaimed portion clearly to avoid unwanted rejection.

Submitting Hand Sketches

Understanding the Problem: Hand sketched drawings are mostly the result of attempt to save the money & time spent on hiring a professional illustrator which eventually costs more after receiving the office action.

How to Avoid It: Hire a professional patent illustrator as they have the access to various CAD software to draft the drawings.

Ignoring Jurisdiction Specific Guidelines

Understanding the Problem: Different patent offices (USPTO, EPO, CINPA, etc.) have different guidelines/standards for drawings. For example, USPTO allows shading in patent drawings, however in China, shading and dotted lines are not permitted.

How to Avoid It: Equip yourself with the specific drawing requirements for each jurisdiction or hire a professional patent illustrator who understands international filing standards.

Conclusion

When it comes to patents, clear and accurate illustrations are not just decorative things, they are integral part of the patent application. Even the strongest invention can be compromised by poor illustrations. Avoiding these common mistakes can improve the chances of a smoother application process.

Whether you are filing a utility or design patent, remember: precision, compliance, and clarity matter.

About PatDraw

Cut costs without cutting corners. PatDraw delivers USPTO-compliant patent drawings at a straightforward $28 per sheet (not per figure) for both utility and design patents - a disruptive pricing model in the industry.

Our disruptive $28 per sheet pricing (with multiple figures per sheet) delivers industry-leading quality backed by Effectual Services. More drawings, same professional standards, better value.

Ready to place an order? Click here: Utility Patent Drawings | Design Patent Drawings | Access Samples Here