Blog, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, IP industry, IP Litigation, Patent

Patent filing for technology: Transforming smartphone industry in 2020

Apple introduced the first smartphone in 2007, and since then, peoples’ daily lives have changed dramatically. The difference in the capability of the original iPhone and the iPhone 11 is massive. The first iPhone had just 128 megabytes of RAM, a processor with a clock speed of 412 MHz, and a maximum storage capacity of 16 gigabytes. When the iPhone was introduced, its specifications were very impressive. A lot has changed since. Fast forward to today when low-end smartphones costing less than 5K rupees have specifications that far exceed those of the first iPhone.

What has led to advances in smartphones?

Behind Advances in Smartphones

A smartphone today doubles as TV, wallet, GPS, music player, video game console, camera and much more. The huge leaps the smartphone has undergone have been possible because of a robust patent granting system that protects the inventions of phone manufacturers. Because of the payoffs from earning patents, manufacturers have considerable incentives to acquire patents. As a direct result of patents being awarded, the hardware inside smartphones now becomes obsolete within just five to six months. When smartphones were introduced, their hardware didn’t become obsolete for as long as two years.

The patent regime has made it possible to build a more powerful smartphone every few months. Leading manufacturers are pitted in a constant battle to create smartphones that consumers will fall in love with. Competition between major manufacturers had led to the creation of smartphones that are sleek, fast, and have potent cameras. The growth of social media has paralleled advances in smartphone cameras. People love phones with great cameras because they can be used to click great photos and share them quickly

Need for a Strong Patent Portfolio

For smartphone manufacturers to thrive, they need to build a strong patent portfolio. If a smartphone manufacturer has a strong patent portfolio, it has a good chance of making phones that are well received.

There is another advantage to having a strong patent portfolio. Phone manufacturers that have a valuable patent can license the technology to other smartphone manufacturers. By licensing patents, smartphone manufactures can earn revenues. This is precisely what Samsung has done. Samsung has patented technology that makes possible cameras with astoundingly high megapixel counts. The technology can be used to create mobile phone cameras that have a megapixel count as high as 108 to 150 megapixels.

Patents Responsible for Growth of Smartphone Industry

Despite the obvious benefits of patents, there is a widely held belief that granting patents to phone manufacturers stifles innovation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The incentive to earn patents drives manufacturers to develop innovative new technologies that can be used to make better smartphones. Without the ability to protect their inventions from being copied, no smartphone manufacturer would have an incentive to innovate. Consequently, the extraordinarily powerful smartphones consumers love wouldn’t exist. If the patent regime were dismantled, the smartphone industry would rapidly stagnate.

Smartphone manufacturers need to maintain an active patent portfolio because it serves as an effective defence strategy during smartphone wars which could reignite any moment.

Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on India’s Intellectual Property System

AI is disrupting virtually every industry. AI is still in its infancy, yet its versatility and promise are well appreciated. It is being used in healthcare to spot potentially cancerous cells, in chatbots to serve customers, in finance to recognise market patterns no human can discover and in a host of other industries.

AI can be used to spot inventions that merit a patent. Because patents safeguard designs from being used by entities that don’t have a copyright or license, they have been behind the success of all industries over the past two centuries. Today many industries are being transformed by AI. Hence, when AI is used to grant patents; it comes full circle because it helps award patents which in-turn leads to the expansion and creation of industry. Such industries then adopt AI to deliver better products and services.

India’s PTO issued tenders inviting companies to help create an AI and blockchain-powered database. When the database is successfully implemented, the patent granting process will become swifter and less prone to mistakes. AI and blockchain will help evaluate the uniqueness of every invention and judge whether they merit a patent.

There is only one foreseeable disadvantage behind using an AI and blockchain-powered database to grant patents. Large data centres consume enormous power. They also take up considerable space. Should the PTO be willing to face these challenges, there is every reason to believe that by using AI and blockchain, it will be able to grant more patents in a comparatively short period.


Patent filing for technology: Transforming smartphone industry in 2020 By Amit Aggarwal, Co-founder and Director, Effectual Services
https://www.dqindia.com/patent-filing-technology-transforming-smartphone-industry-2020/Article was 1st published On Dataquest_India

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Design, Digital Right Management, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, IP Licensing, IP Litigation, Trademark, Trademark Litigation

Trademark Filing in India- Importance and Analysis of the Market

The Government of India has been taking significant steps to develop favorable arena for Trademark filing. With registered trademark, one can stop others from using the trademarked business name/logo/word with respect to goods or services. Trademarks serve as a mark for identification of good or services and provide a better way to reach out to the huge audience. Trademarks influence the customers’ purchasing decision, reputation and acceptability such brands represent. Trademarks function as a valuable asset as they serve as a life-long support for business expansion. Even the giant companies like Apple protect their important assets for the business by means of trademark.

Recent amendments in Trademark Rules 1999, notified in March 2017, not only simplified the trademark registration process but also removed a number of redundant provisions thus making the overall process extremely user-friendly. Major changes that were brought in by Trademark Amendment Rules 2017 include –

1) reduction of number of Forms needed to be filled from 74 existing forms to 8 consolidated forms.

2) Single application form isrequired to file all type of trademark applications.

3) inclusion of online mode of service.

4) concession in fees to start-ups, individuals and small enterprises.


Trademark Filling in India- Importance and Analysis of the Market By Amit Aggarwal
Co-Founder and Director, Effectual Services

http://www.licensingcorner.com/know-how/trademark-filling-in-india-importance-and-analysis-of-the-market/

Article was 1st published On Licensing Corner

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Digital Right Management, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, Patent

Artificial intelligence: Empowering patent filing

Patent filing in artificial intelligence in India is emerging on a rapid scale, and some of the top companies filing for patents are TATA and HCL Technologies

With the advent of Artificial Intelligence in every imaginable sphere that matters, it is hardly surprising that innovators are now in a rush to build their Intellectual Property portfolio in AI. The popularity of Artificial Intelligence, machine learning, neural networks and all other things related to Intelligent machines has been on the rise for quite some time now. A similarly whopping growth has been observed in the number of machine learning or AI-related patents/applications which have been filed in recent years. A recently published article revealed that patent applications based on machine learning have nearly quadrupled in the last few years, owing to the widespread use of the same in all major technological fields. Since the formal conception of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning, way back in the 50s, more than 300,000 patent applications and over a million scientific journals have been published.

Further, WIPO has stated that over one-third of the published patents/applications in the AI domain are related to Machine Learning. It has been estimated that the average annual growth in patents related to machine-learning is somewhere between 25 and 30 percent. Machine learning techniques such as deep learning, reinforcement learning, neural networks have seen unprecedented growth in terms of patent filings in the last few years.

AI has often been compared to the “Electricity of the new era”. If so, Machine learning can surely be considered to be the wire which conducts it. WIPO has recently taken upon itself to develop a framework for the field of AI, including the applications of machine learning such as processing of speech and digital signal processing. The vital areas which would be completely transformed by AI were also identified, such as Transport and Communication. However, other sectors such as Law, Banking, Medicine, Entertainment, Agriculture are not far behind either in utilizing machine learning and AI, and building their respective patent portfolios as well. Bearing these facts in mind, it is not hard to see the growing interest of inventors in patenting their AI end applications.


Artificial intelligence: Empowering patent filing By Amit Aggarwal
Co-Founder and Director, Effectual Services

Artificial intelligence: Empowering patent filing

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Compulsory Patent License, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, Patent Infringement

Patent issues leading to unprecedented growth of IoT companies

It is unclear today how to draft a patent framework that allows seamless communication between IoT devices manufactured by different companies adhering to different standards

IoT products are a major component of Industry 4.0 which brings together advances in computational power, wireless communication, AI, and data to build a vast technology infrastructure that works nearly autonomously.

The size of the IoT market is expected to grow spectacularly over the next decade. Globally, by 2020, it is expected to reach $7 trillion, and in India $9.2 billion.

Huge advances in manufacturing have allowed even small manufacturers to produce relatively sophisticated IoT products. This brings to the surface issues of patents governing IoT products and communication standards governing devices.

Patents in IoT space present opportunities

Until now most manufacturers of IoT products sought patents on physical products, the configuration of devices and their structures, output, and operation. Most IoT devices work within electronic products, healthcare products, and household products. Patenting products in which IoT devices can be used could potentially stymie the growth of the IoT industry. Thankfully examples set by some of the largest technology companies in the world including Apple, IBM, Samsung, and Qualcomm reveal there is a wide range of products that can be embedded with IoT devices.

New IoT products are regularly conceived and their function cannot be patented. Hence a tiny IoT capsule that upon being swallowed, captures and relays images from inside the human body cannot be patented. This allows companies that didn’t conceive of an IoT product to also manufacture a somewhat identical device. Functions for which IoT products can be created are numerous as well.


Patent issues leading to unprecedented growth of IoT companies  By Amit Aggarwal
Co-Founder and Director, Effectual Services

https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet-of-things/patent-issues-leading-to-unprecedented-growth-of-iot-companies/70877591

Article was 1st published On ETCIO

 

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, Patent

Patent licensing – The future enabling innovation for 5G technology

In a world of superheroes and avenging champions of mankind, it would not be an understatement to say that 5G is looked at as a real-world superpower by many. There is good reason for this. The vast portal of technology that has been opened up by 5G, such as watching Ultra High-Definition videos with zero waiting time, the extensive use of Augmented and Virtual Reality, and the perennially connected network of IoT (Internet of Things) devices are enough proof that 5G has the ability to transform the world into a giant hub of ultra-high-speed connectivity. 5G has a potential to connect everything together, including vehicles, ships, buildings, meters, machines and other items, together with electronics, software, sensors, and the Cloud.

 

The top players in telecom have long since woken up to this – what has ensued the most intense patent war of modern times, rivaled only by the recently concluded smartphone patent wars. Behemoths like SamsungNokiaHuaweiEricsson, Intel, and Qualcomm have all put their cards on the table for building the most impressive Intellectual Property portfolio. This can be attributed to the fact that a number of industries will benefit once 5G truly takes over. Every industry utilizing or benefiting from 5G would have to take a license from the companies holding the 5Gpatents. Meaning, that the licensing revenues from patent licensing in 5G space would be huge. Read More


 

Patent licensing – The future enabling innovation for 5G technology By Amit Aggarwal
Co-Founder and Director, Effectual Services

https://www.bgr.in/features/patent-licensing-the-future-enabling-innovation-for-5g-technology-811127/

Article was 1st published On BGR India

 

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Digital Right Management, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, IP Licensing, Patent

Patent Services- Trends and Analysis Transforming the Smartphone Industry

Smartphones Industry has taken the technological market by storm in India, with an urban audience, generally categorized as millennials, keenly observing the market and waiting to get their hands on every piece of new technology that comes bundled within the new smartphones. From “feature phones” constructed chiefly for the purpose of placing and receiving calls, to “smartphones” capable of overpowering computers, the journey has involved a lot of innovation and patent rights have performed akey strategic role in protecting those intellectual breakthroughs against unfair use.

The patent portfolio of a tech driven organization, along with its various intellectual property assets such as designs, trademarks and copyrights, is vital for its future success. A growth strategy aimed at strengthening the innovative capabilities of domestic firms and businesses can go a long way in ensuring a sustainable competitive advantage for domestic firms with the help of a strong intellectual property regime. Companies are able to invest in R&D of these technologies primarily because of the security and promise of the economic returns that these patent rights provide to their inventions.

Smartphone wars: The Patent battles
The patent rights, generally seen as a means of protection against unfair use, have also served as weapons used by the behemoth Smartphone companies in the infamous “Smartphone wars”. What kick-started in 2009, with Nokia suing Apple for using some of its SEP’s (Standard Essential Patents) without paying, has been followed by major wars between leading companies, the prominent ones being the series of lawsuits between Apple and Samsung and the numerous lawsuits launched against Google by an alliance of tech enterprises like Microsoft, Apple, BlackBerry, Sony, and Ericsson under the name “Rockstar” to de-throne the largest search engine in what is described as the “nuclear attack” in the patent smartphone wars.

The great deal of lawsuits involving telecom patents also justifies the interest and investment of handset and OS providers in the R&D of communication technologies, as a significant portfolio of communication patents would provide a stronger defense to companies when patents are asserted against them. As a matter of fact, this technology space created by the patent rights has
taken us from the slow-moving 2G communication phase to the point that 5G communication testing has already started in some countries.

A research indicates that a large proportion of the smartphone patent wars are associated to mobile data access, touch screens and transmission of mobile data, each of which has a different company dominating the patent portfolio.

Smartphone Patents: Pros and Cons
All the major tech-giants, now own a substantial smartphone patent portfolio. And while this level of patent activity is a positive indicator of innovation in the field, those who doubt the significance of patents argue that patents lead to hike in the prices of smartphones, and are scared of the consequences of sending legal threats and enforcing patents. Other than this, one might also find a group of individuals who see the smartphone-related patents as a means that harms the innovation.

However, there’s no concrete evidence to support the statement that patents have harmed innovation in the industry. In fact, smartphones have advanced quickly than any other consumer product over the past decade, and have seen a fair share of innovational breakthroughs from multiple-screens to curved screens, all thanks to the protection offered by the patent rights.

Citing a real world example of the importance of intellectual assets, the single thing that kept its boat afloat at the point where Nokia had completely lost its monopoly over the cell phone market was the revenue generated from the licensing of patents that it had filed over the years. Standing somewhere between the winners and the losers that were downgraded to has been as a result of the smartphone wars, the company’s timely focus on developing a strong IP portfolio paid off when it failed to develop products that could keep pace with the rapidly-changing smartphone market at the time.

Smartphone Patents: The Indian Landscape
In the past few years, India has emerged as a favorite destination for all the major Smartphone companies, be it the Chinese Smartphone brands like Vivo, Oppo, Oneplus, Xiaomi etc or the global leaders like Samsung, Apple etc. A detailed look on the patent activity of these companies in the country, however, reveals a complete different story. Vivo and Oneplus does not have much patent activity, thanks to the patent filings of their sibling Oppo in the country, which makes it easier for them to use all those technologies without any fear. Another Chinese giant, Xiaomi also has very little presence when it comes to patent filings in India, a lot lesser that their Chinese patent portfolio and have been sued by Ericsson for patent infringement during the days of its dawn in the Indian market. Even the players of the big leagues like Apple have very few filings in India.

Conclusion
The smartphone industry has been driven by the active involvement of patent rights since the beginning. And while the filings by the leading companies are mostly done from a defensive perspective, the virtues offered by building a strong patent portfolio can be seen in the results of the past smartphone wars where the winners walked away with billions while some of the losing parties completely lost their grip of the market. Talking about the patent activity in the Indian market, the Government needs to scrutinize intellectual policies to drive filings by the big players, as a good manufacturing hub has to have filing by the big players of the game.

To sum up, patent services have played a crucial role in the growth of the smartphone industry since the beginning and will continue to water this ongoing technology sector especially during the upcoming phase where most of the companies are unlocking their innovational potential and working towards the age of folding screens and complete display smartphones.

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, IP Licensing, IP Litigation, Patent, Patent Infringement, Patent Opposition, Press Releases, Uncategorized

EFFECTUAL SERVICES – BS Best Places to Work in 2019

To foster innovation and creativity, intellectual property (IP) must be protected. Creations of the mind, such as names, symbols, new technological processes, etc. can be protected through patents, copyrights and trademarks. In an era of start-ups and unconventional career paths, an awareness of laws that protect intellectual property can go a long way in boosting the economy. The IP industry also plays an important role in keeping public interest in mind, while at the same time enabling organizations to profit from their ideas and innovations.

Effectual Services performs this very task of striking a balance. The organization has grown to become one of the most trusted partners offering IP support solutions to a number of companies. It has helped clients in generating ideas to produce sustainable solutions regarding patents and trademarks. It also offers high level strategic consulting services that helps mitigate risks in the decision making process.

Collaboration:

Effectual Services caters to clients from 22 countries across 5 continents, including 55 of the Fortune 500 companies, and offers support across various disciplines. The organization’s mission is to respect all stakeholders and encourage collaboration. It also works with several SME’s to protect their innovations from bigger sharks in the industry and ensure revenue gains.

Awards & Achievements:

Since its inception, Effectual Services is leading the IP industry, and has been recognized for its contributions.

  • Founder Amit Aggarwal have been listed in IAM Strategy 300: The World’s Leading IP Strategists 2019.
  • Awarded Deloitte India Technology Fast 50 Awards – 14th fastest growing company in India in 2014.
  • Awarded Deloitte Asia Pacific Fast 500 Awards – 124th fastest growing company in Asia Pacific in 2014.
  • Awarded Red Herring – Winner of Asia Top 100 Award in 2015.
  • Received “IP Excellence in India” in 2018 & 2019.
  • ISO 27001: 2013 – Information Security Certified.
  • Member of IFCCI since November 2017.
  • Member of IGCC since December 2017.
  • Member of IACC since March 2018.

Services

  • Patentability / Novelty Search
  • Invalidity Searches / Claim Charts
  • Clearance Searches
  • Patent Proofreading Services
  • Evidence of Use

Team:

Effectual Services consists of a team of driven, highly experienced employees who perform with excellence. The organization exudes trust, and has encouraged loyalty in its employees, many of whom have been working with the organization since its inception. Employees hold the organization’s mantra, “Client Centricity, Ethics & Integrity, Innovation & Integrity, Ownership, Respect & Collaboration” close to their hearts. A unique feature is the existence of “quality circles” who meet to discuss problems, and brainstorm solutions. The work culture is healthy with a democratic leadership style, where each one is encouraged to express their views and ideas, to grow both professionally and personally. A platform is also given to individuals to blow the whistle, ensuring complete transparency.

A special feature of the organization is its “Team Off Sites”, where people can bond and simultaneously break the monotony of their work life which leads to enhanced productivity. Thus the organization encourages freedom of expression and high levels of engagement in all its activities.

Founder:

Mr. Amit Aggarwal has 17+ years’ experience, and is focused on creating awareness of the industry in India, especially among students. Venturing into a relatively new industry was a brave risk. Building a team of 175+ analysts from scratch, and encouraging and informing parents and employees about the scope of a new industry has also been challenging. But, with democratic leadership, the organization has overcome every hurdle and has become a trail blazer. Ideas also had to be generated on expediting the training while maintaining employee effectiveness and mentoring students. Ensuring consultancy services are fact driven and result oriented has also added to the value of the company. Thus as a founder, Mr. Aggarwal’s vision and leadership has played a vital role in every decision taken by the organization.

The organization’s vision, “to be the most innovative business partner serving the knowledge economy, by attracting and nurturing the best global talent”, lays down the perfect road map to achieve its goals in the future.

CSR:

Effectual Services has organized social awareness sessions for employees, conducted drives on the environment and supports underprivileged children. Tie ups with NGO’s and orphanages also help the organization make a positive impact on society.

Future Ahead:        

The organization plans to expand to other locations, especially in Europe, Asia and Australia. It also plans to expand vertically by pairing up with like-minded organizations or investing in new business opportunities. It considers collaborations a significant aspect in expansion. Working with more Fortune 500 companies to help craft IP strategies, and also save SME’s from frivolous litigation by NPE’s is a key concern for the organization.

With utmost dedication and firm belief in the consultancy services they provide, Effectual Services has overcome several challenges and made a lasting impression in the IP industry, and continues to do so.

Read More
Articles, Blog, Brand Valuation, Compulsory Patent License, Digital Right Management, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, Patent, Patent Infringement, Patent Opposition, Pharma- Biotech- Patent Commercialisation

How to research a patent idea by performing novelty invention search?

How to carry out research on patentable idea?

A novelty patent search is performed to analyse whether your idea/ technology / invention is new or not.  The patent search novelty report provided by the patent expert will tell you whether your invention is novel or not. The search report will include list of selected granted patents, published patents and non-patent literature which will become prior art existing for your technology. The patent search report will also contain legal expert opinion on the novelty of your invention. Our patent lawyers and attorneys assist in re-engineering your invention in the light of prior art documents

How can Patent Search help in determining Patentability of Invention?

Before spending time, money and resources for filing a patent application, it is strongly advisable to conduct a patent search . A qualified patent attorney can determine patentability of an invention by analysing relevant prior art references (published patent applications, granted patents and non-patent literature) in accordance with patent laws of relevant jurisdictions.

Patent Search before Filing A Patent Application 

While conducting a prior art search and performing patentability analysis, patent attorneys ensure that the search is comprehensive and corresponding analysis is thorough to include all possible embodiments of the proposed invention. Generally, the patent search results are compiled in the form of a detailed document known as patent search report. The patent search report further helps in writing a draft specification for patent.

 

Read More
Blog, Compulsory Patent License, Digital Right Management, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, Patent, Patent Infringement, Patent Opposition

HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INVENTION IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES?

Like any other Intellectual Property Right, Patent also is territorial in nature. Granted patent of one country cannot give protection in any other country other than the one it is granted in. The only option to protect any invention in foreign countries is to have a granted patent in those countries. It is again a lengthy and an expensive process to apply for a patent in different countries separately. But like trademarks, there are certain treaties and conventions to make it a little easier for the applicant to protect his/her invention in foreign countries.

The following are the treaties and conventions:

  • PARIS CONVENTION: In the case of trademarks, Paris Convention confers on applicants a Right to Priority which says a person applying for a trademark under Paris Convention gets a Right to Priority in all the member countries at the time of registration. Same way this right is given to the patents also. A person applying for a patent under Paris Convention can get a priority right in the member countries to apply but with a grace period of one year in case of utility patent and a period of six months for a design patent.
  • TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (TRIPS): Under the Paris Convention, only member countries get the luxury of grace period, and non-members of the Paris Convention get the same luxury under TRIPS agreement provided they are the members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
  • PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT): Under PCT also, an applicant gets only a grace period to apply in different countries but under this, the period is a little longer, it gives a total of 30 months grace period to the applicant to apply in different nations.

Under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, a person files for a patent and opts for an international search by International Search Authority (ISA) which does a search and issues a search report along with a non-binding written opinion to the respective patent office. The respective patent office later publishes the invention approximately after 18 months of priority date. After which, an applicant has a choice to apply in multiple nations within a 30 month period. Later, the respective countries will carry on their respective patent grant procedures to grant a patent. The most important point to be noted is that a PCT application does not guarantee a patent to be granted in the countries that they have applied for but only assures a priority right.

From the above discussion, we may understand that it is not possible to get a patent protected in multiple nations with a single application but can only get a priority right. Since India is a member of all the above-mentioned treaties, an applicant from India can apply under any of them to get his/her patent registered in multiple nations.

Read More
Blog, Brand Valuation, Hi Tech Patent Litigation, India, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Patent Infringement, Patent Opposition, Pharma- Biotech- Patent Commercialisation

Life Cycle of a Patent

A patent issued for an invention allows exclusive rights of the invention. In order to be eligible for a patent, the invention has to possess new characteristics and not be apparent for an average expertise. Patenting your invention prevents other people, your competitors, from producing, utilizing, selling or offering to sell the patented item/method within the boundaries of the country, or import it into the country. As the patent owner, you can dispose of your invention by selling the patent, patent right – entirely or partially, as well as license the use of it.

Patenting Process: The process begins with the filing of a patent application and ends with the rejection or issuance of a granted patent. The process starts as soon as an idea is conceived.

Conception of an Idea: The first thing to remember is that one cannot patent an idea. The idea or concept needs to be put together as an invention. The idea and invention together form what the law calls conception. The conception date is important since it can be utilized to argue against prior art cited by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

If two or more patent applicants file separate patent applications at the Patent Office for the same invention, the Patent Office conducts what is called “interference.” The conception date is important when interference is initiated to prove which inventor was the first to create the invention. Interference is basically a mini-trial to determine which inventor invented first and is thus entitled to the patent. Like trials in court, evidence is what wins the day. Detailed records are evidence that the inventor was diligent in developing the invention. One need not have a prototype built in order to get a patent, but should be able to describe the invention with enough clarity so that someone who is technically skilled in the art can understand how to make and use the invention.

After conception of an idea and diligently recording it one should move further trying to finalize the invention. This process is called as reduction to practice. Reduction to practice, therefore, can occur through the creation of a prototype or the specific definition of the invention in writing in a filled patent application.

First to Invent and First to File: U.S. patent law stands apart from the rest of the world: it alone adheres to a “first-to-invent” system, which allows an inventor to assert first-inventor rights and claim priority back to the date when the invention was first conceived. Thus, in a priority contest between competing inventors, the inventors’ dates of conception and reduction-to-practice take precedence over their application filing dates. Almost every other country in the world has a patent system based on the “First-to-File” doctrine, in which the patent is granted to the inventor who is the first to file a patent application, regardless of the date of invention.

Patentability (Novelty or prior art) Search (Optional): Patentability searches are performed before applying for a patent to assure an invention is patentable. A patentability search examines granted and published applications of major patent offices as well as domain-relevant non-patent literature. A Patentability Search answers the following questions:

  • Is my idea or invention novel?
  • Has it been patented earlier or given the scope of patentability, is it worth the cost of filing a patent?
  • Is it worth the effort and expense to fully develop and market your concept?

Patent Drafting and Filing the patent application

Filing a Provisional Patent Application: After the patent search stage if the applicant decides to move forward then applicant can either file a provisional or a non-provisional patent application. In situations where all the details of the invention are not available, applicant can consider filing a provisional patent application. The provisional patent application may include the basic idea of the invention. It is not required to provide the patent application according to the Patent Office patent application guidelines.

Filing a Non provisional Patent Application: In order for the patent prosecution process to begin, a non-provisional patent application must be filed within one year of filing a provisional application. A non provisional patent application is the application you file when you want the Patent Office to review the filing and proceed toward issuing a utility patent application. A complete patent application includes a specification describing the invention, including any necessary drawings, an oath by the inventors, claims legally defining the scope of the invention, and an appropriate filing fee. In case the non provisional patent application submitted is in complete, the applicant will receive either a Notice of Missing Parts or a Notice of Omitted Items. The Notice of Missing parts awards a filing date and explains what must be submitted and by when, and includes any fee (i.e., penalty) due for the privilege of this later filing. With respect to the Notice of Omitted Items, such a notice explains that you have referred to something in the application that was not included in the original filing.

Patent Publication: The U.S. Patent Office will treat any non-provisional patent application as confidential until the patent application is published. This usually happens 18 months after filing the application. The eighteen-month publication provisions apply to divisional, continuations, continuation in part, and international applications entering the national phase in the US. For a fee, the publication can be moved to either an earlier or later date depending on the desire of the inventor.

Non Publication Request: A non publication request prevents an application from being published until the application issues as a granted patent. An applicant can avoid publication by certifying in a formal non-publication request that it is not planning to file a parallel application in a foreign country that has an 18-month publication requirement. This is beneficial to an applicant because they are able to keep the information confidential if they don’t obtain a patent. If the applicant is confused between protecting the information as a trade secret or as a patent, and if a patent is ultimately not granted, the applicant can still keep the information as a trade secret. If a non-publication request is made and the applicant subsequently decides to file a parallel foreign application subject to an 18-month publication requirement, the applicant must notify the Patent Office within forty-five days after the date of foreign filing or risk abandonment of the application.

Patent Examination and Office Action:The examiner may first check the number of inventions claimed in the application. According to USPTO, there can only be one invention claimed in a single patent. If the examiner determines that there is more than one claimed invention in the application, the examiner will request the inventor to restrict the application to only one. The inventor may then file a separate (divisional or continuation or continuation in parts) application while still keeping the original filing date.

After resolving this, the examiner may review the application to determine if the claimed invention is patentable.

After the examiner has examined the application, examiner sends an Office Action to the applicant. The office action cites prior art and gives reasons why the examiner has allowed, or approved, the applicant’s claims, and/or rejected the claims. There are several types of Office actions: examiner’s amendments, priority actions, non-final Office actions, final Office actions, and suspension inquiry letters. The applicant must respond to each Office Action within 3 months from the Office Action date. 3 months extension can be granted by paying additional fee.

There can be a series of office actions before the examiner makes the rejections final. There is still an opportunity to amend and make changes. In order to continue examination of the application one can cancel claims, place claims in better condition for appeal, or amend the claims as per suggestion of the Examiner that would make a claim patentable.

Request for Continuing Examination: On receiving a final rejection the applicant may file a Request for Continuing Examination (RCE). This RCE will restart prosecution and the amended claims are examined just as if they were being presented for the first time in a newly filed application.

If you choose to have the allowed claims issue you can choose to file a Continuation or a Continuation in Part, which will allow for you to continue to try and persuade the patent examiner that certain claims are allowable. Both Continuations and Continuations in Part start a new application process from the beginning, as opposed to the RCE which continues forward on the same application.

Appeal: Along the way a decision can be made to appeal a Final Rejection by the examiner. Such an appeal goes to the Board of Patent Appeals (BPAI), and perhaps ultimately to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Allowance and Grant of Patent: After the examination of the application or at a later stage during the reconsideration of the application, if the patent application is found to be allowable, a Notice of Allowance is issued by the Patent Office to grant you a patent. Issue fees are drawn generally within three months of the Notice of Allowance. The issued fee must be paid after you get that Notice of Allowance and the patent will be published and issued several months later when it is printed with a patent number in the official gazette and published in the USPTO website.

Patent Term and fees: A granted patent will expire after 20 years of the filing date, unless it expires earlier due to a failure to pay fees or a declaration of invalidity by a court. After the patent expires, the invention is available to all. Design patents, unlike utility patents, have a term of 14 years from the date of issue. If the patent office takes longer than three years to examine and grant a patent, the term of the patent may be adjusted accordingly.

There are three patent maintenance fee payments that must be made during the life of your patent to keep it in force. Maintenance fees on utility patents in the United States are due 3½, 7½ and 11½ years after grant of the patent. No maintenance fees are due while an application is pending. Design patents and plant patents are not subject to maintenance fees at all.

 

Read More